well..
as someone who drives one of these for vintage harvest days each summer, you almost got it right, there are a few things though.
the steering axle or back axle is a bit narrower than what your model has, and the front end/front axle is bit wider and the stairs up to the cab can extended out so you can fit tein wheels as well.
other than that i think you hit the spot pretty well.
what is it with you and not putting a proper cab option on your mods? 🤨
- both the other Deutz and now this one as well 🤔
it looks so good, but totally unplayable for realism without a cab.
why remove the cab?
it's look so silly and ugly without it
no its not?
it just says "TP 4000", that could be anything and mean anything.
beside missing the width specification in the description, it also doesnt have optimal horsepower needed or anything.
it's just lazy as hell.
the twin wheels need some spacing out, you would never mount duals that close 😅
the reasons why they have a gap/spacing in the first place is to allow for sidewall flex in the tires, better flotation and so the dirt doesn't build up.
no worries, thought you might wanna know with all the other detailed work you are doing on it, so it looks right 👍🏻
the twin wheels need some spacing out, you would never mount duals that close 😅
the reasons why they have a gap/spacing in the first place is to allow for sidewall flex in the tires, better flotation and so the dirt doesn't build up.
Those horsepower numbers are COMPLETELY wrong and you are missing models as well.
The model number of the tractor indicates the amount of horsepower, so the 185 would have a 185 hp, not 225.
technically and realistically it is wrong though, because you never would put the number of boosted horsepower as the nominal horsepower output, that would be lying and false advertising, which is also why CNH chose to put the nominal power output on, which coincidentally also happens to be the model number, and not only on the Puma Series, its across the board.
- and for the amount of work the modder has put in here, i would say keeping it realistic would be ideal.
now you can always throw in some extra xml engine options that has the boosted horsepower numbers for each model which is normally/typically 30 to 50 horsepower, but can be as high as 70 yo 90 in some cases, buy its really not as much as one thinks it is, because the engines still have emissions regulations and standards to meet.
now you can then choose to circumvent that by chipping and other modifications making more power, but in most cases that will also require you to delete the emissions equipment installed from factory and the variable blade turbo setup.
New Holland and Case tractors these days both use this system of using the nominal power as the model number, back in the day it was only Case that did it of the two, because New Holland had that wired "Txxxx" system nobody really understood.
Those horsepower numbers are COMPLETELY wrong and you are missing models as well.
The model number of the tractor indicates the amount of horsepower, so the 185 would have a 185 hp, not 225.
that is not how boost works mate.
the number on the hood is still the correct amount of base/net horsepower the tractor has, boost is a feature that gives a little bit extra on top, but is not available all the time because it is pushing the engine and drivetrain closer to its limits, boost is only available under certain types of load conditions fx. baling with a big square baler where the pto uses a lot of power, but that doesn't change anything or the fact that the number on the hood is the horsepower you buy and have available most of the time and its the same for both New Holland and Case IH tractors and for any other tractor brand that has a boost feature for that matter.
also this series or production of the Puma, if you rather want it worded that way, is from before they started you using turbo's with variable blade angle which is what gives you the "boost" feature, that was first introduced in 2013.
Nicely done on this one 👌🏻
Do you have any plans on making a proper drawbar for it to attach trailers to?
- like one that uses the "attacherJointlow" prefix?
hopefully that picture helps explain what I mean with proper drawbar 😅
